Hi Luca, On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 11:44:04AM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:41:18 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:38:37 +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote: > >> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:19:04AM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > >> >> BTW, as soon as the BTS will assign a bug number, I'll post the git > >> >> patch. > >> > > >> > Just a side-note: Are you aware that you may send a patch (including > >> > the appropriate tag) along with your original bug report? > >> > >> For the patch: do you mean the one at [1], also available on my git > >> repository [2]? In case not, what kind of patch? > > [...] > > > > No, I was just saying that you do not need to wait for a bug number > > being assigned to a bug if you want to provide a patch > > I based my patch to the one fixing #428418 [1] (upstream at [2]): the > idea is that the *git* patch should be "complete", thus also including > the Debian bug number the patch is trying to fix.
Oh, I see - sorry for the noise then :-) Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
