tags 462295 + upstream unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:54:09 -0800, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote: > I happened to notice that duplicating a sheet, and re-entering a cell's > value within the new sheet, produces different results, and that > recalculating with F9 works around the bug. > > The sheets are in a big, slow and proprietary workbook. > > In case you're hoping I'll take the time to cut it down to a small one > that duplicates the bug,
Well, without a test case all I can do about this bug is * Mark it as unreproducible. [Done] * Ask you to retest with every new Gnumeric release - did anything about this issue change with 1.8.1? * Point out that the Debian sources to Gnumeric do not patch the core Gnumeric engine in any way, so issues like this can be reported at bugzilla.gnome.org directly - just mention that you're using the Debian packages, and if there is something Debian-specific about the issue, the developers know where to find me. [Marked accordingly] * Point out that as documented under http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnumeric/how-to-help.shtml, the Gnumeric developers have a policy for handling confidential files illustrating a problem. Kind regards, Ray -- [Open Source] is the finest expression of the free market. Ideas are encouraged to proliferate and the best thinking wins. By contrast, most corporations today operate in a central planning straitjacket. http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,15772,00.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
