On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:29:57 +0530 Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > I am afraid not. Please see this dpkg bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454628 > > Therefore, ugly as it may seem, the postrm seems to be the simplets > way to assure compliance, from what I have seen for the other > packages. OK, thanks for the info. I'll try to get around to fixing it soonish. [[[Hubert's own notes, so that he can refer to it when he looks at the bug again: http://www.dpkg.org/dpkg/ConffileHandling 50nowebm.el should be moved to 50noweb.el when the "nowebm" package is upgraded. ]]] -- Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
