On 06/02/08 at 21:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Martin, > > If you want to ask me something, please put me in to "To:" or "Cc:", or > use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Submitters don't receive answers > automatically. > > On 06/02/08 at 10:39 -0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > On Feb 6, 2008 6:02 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Package: libmodule-load-conditional-perl > > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > > i386. > > > > > > Relevant part: > > > > > > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 6) > > > > Build-Depends-Indep: liblocale-maketext-simple-perl, > > > libmodule-load-perl, libparams-check-perl, perl (>= 5), perl-modules (>> > > > 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69) > > > > > > perl: already installed (5.8.8-12 >= 5 is satisfied) > > > > perl-modules: non-matching version installed (5.8.8-12 ! >> 5.10) > > > > Default version of perl-modules not sufficient, no suitable > > > alternative found. I probably should dep-wait this one. > > > > It seems that your builder is not correctly interpreting the depends, > > as they are perfectly satisfiable in unstable. > > Is it possible that your definition of unstable include experimental? :-)
Oh, you meant that perl-modules (>> 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69) is satisfiable by installing libversion-perl from unstable? sbuild doesn't do that, unfortunately. Couldn't you write libversion-perl | perl-modules, so that it works with sbuild? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]