gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > AFAICS the test in checks/binaries tries to match the Depends: line > against > /(?:^|,)\s*perlapi-[\d.]+(?:\s*\[[^\]]+\])(?:\s*,|\z)/ > where the [..] part seems a little strange to me. At a first glace it > could just be left out IMO.
It was, er, supposed to be optional. *sigh*. Fixed now. It catches architecture restrictions to allow for perlapi-5.8.8 [i386]. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
