Hi Robert, Robert Luberda wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Somehow I must have completely missed that discussion. Thank you for >>> the pointer. I guess what happens next is in the hands of doc-base >>> maintainer then? >> That would be my preference. If he says that we'll continue using the >> menu categories, I'm happy to change lintian accordingly. > > It would be great if lintian could check the doc-base files sections. > Nevertheless we need to improve the doc-base section hierarchy first > to make it better fit to documentation needs. I don't think it should > be strictly bound to the menu's one. I gave my proposal at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=37;bug=109431 > (which isn't perfect though), and since nobody objected I'm going to > implement it in doc-base soon.
I don't see sections "Science/Data Analysis" or "Science/Physics" in your list of new fields at that message. Could you please include them as valid fields if they weren't already going to be? Should I be pro-active and change "Apps/Science" to "Science/Physics" in my physics-related doc-base files with my next uploads to unstable, or would it be better to wait a bit more? best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://www.starplot.org/ WWW: http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/ GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]