I have some news regarding this issue:
If I add the following line
binary-predeb/faac:: binary-predeb/libfaac0
to the very top of debian/rules (i.e. right between the shebang line and the
first include line), the faac package ends up with the right versioned
dependency on the libfaac0 shared library package.
I believe this is due to the order in which the binary-predeb rule is executed
per package. Currently the rule calls the three commands
dh_installdeb
dh_perl
dh_shlibdeps
for each package in debian/control one by one. This means that - if the faac
package occurs before the libfaac0 package in debian/control - the
${shlib:Depends} for faac are calculated before dh_installdeb has been run for
libfaac0. Thus faac's dh_shlibdeps does not consider libfaac0's shlibs file.
I believe (but have not tested yet, though) that the issue will be fixed if
first dh_installdeb is run for each package in debian/control and *then* both
dh_perl and dh_shlibdep are run for each package.
To make a long story short, please consider changing this behaviour
dh_installdeb -pfaac
dh_perl -pfaac
dh_shlibdeps -pfaac
dh_installdeb -plibfaac0
dh_perl -plibfaac0
dh_shlibdeps -plibfaac0
into this
dh_installdeb -pfaac
dh_installdeb -plibfaac0
dh_perl -pfaac
dh_shlibdeps -pfaac
dh_perl -plibfaac0
dh_shlibdeps -plibfaac0
Thank you for your effort!
Cheers,
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
