Package: meep
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: gfortran

Hi!

I would request you to please shift Build-Depends to use the new
gfortran based Lapack and Blas packages in order to phase out packages
dependent on the old g2c (g77). In this regard, I would request you to
refer to:

http://wiki.debian.org/GfortranTransition

You may wish to rename the package in order to provide for parallel
installability of the g77 and gfortran based meep packages, if you
choose to upload to unstable.

Attached is a patch which does the needful, which you may use to base
your change.

Thank you.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
diff -u meep-0.10/debian/rules meep-0.10/debian/rules
--- meep-0.10/debian/rules
+++ meep-0.10/debian/rules
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@
 	dh_testdir
 	-mkdir debian/build-serial
 	cd debian/build-serial && \
-		../../configure $(CONFIGURE_FLAGS)
+		F77=gfortran ../../configure $(CONFIGURE_FLAGS) || true
 	touch configure-stamp-serial
 
 configure-stamp-mpich:
 	dh_testdir
 	-mkdir debian/build-mpich
 	cd debian/build-mpich && \
-		../../configure $(CONFIGURE_FLAGS) \
+		F77=gfortran ../../configure $(CONFIGURE_FLAGS) \
 		--with-mpi=yes
 	touch configure-stamp-mpich
 
diff -u meep-0.10/debian/control meep-0.10/debian/control
--- meep-0.10/debian/control
+++ meep-0.10/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: science
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Loïc Le Guyader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, atlas3-base-dev, lapack3-dev, fftw-dev, libctl-dev (>= 3.0.0), libhdf5-serial-dev, libmpich1.0-dev, libgsl0-dev, pkg-config, libharminv-dev (>= 1.1), dpatch
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, libatlas-base-dev, liblapack-dev, fftw-dev, libctl-dev (>= 3.0.0), libhdf5-serial-dev, libmpich1.0-dev, libgsl0-dev, pkg-config, libharminv-dev (>= 1.1), dpatch, gfortran
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: meep

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to