On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 01:55:29PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > > I guess what he was trying to say, was that a versioned close + notfixed > > > is > > > the same as an unversioned close. (notfixed removes the version, but does > > > not > > > change the status of the bug.) > > > > Ah. For the record I am inclined to think that is at best unintuitive > > and probably a bug. > > We need a command that does what notfixed does.
I'm not arguing that notfixed shouldn't do what it does now. I'm arguing that it should *also* mark the bug as open if it's currently marked as done and there are no fixed versions remaining - straightforward bookkeeping, IMO. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
