On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:59 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> anjuta currently specifies:
>
> libneon26-dev | libneon27-dev, libsvn-dev,
>
> With libneon27-dev and libsvn-dev installed, libneon26-dev is
> uninstallable:
>
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> libneon26
> The following packages will be REMOVED
> libneon27-dev libsvn-dev
> The following NEW packages will be installed
> libneon26 libneon26-dev
>
> The buildds report:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libsvn-dev: Depends: libneon27-dev but it is not going to be installed
> E: Broken packages
>
> Is there a reason to retain support for building against libneon26-dev
> in the Debian package? libsvn-dev cannot (apparently) use libneon26-dev
> which may be the source of the problem. (i.e. to build against
> libneon26-dev, libsvn-dev also needs to be optional).
This is so that package can be built in gutsy from the same source. I
think the solution is just to invert the ordering to:
libneon27-dev | libneon26-dev
I will try that.
Regards,
Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
