Hi! On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:41:00PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > imagemagick 6.3.9.0 is available from upstream. Are you planning to > > > package it? > > > > Even 6.3.9.1 is out by now, I think. We'll have to review the diff to > > the version currently in Debian for the potential ABI/API breakage and > > other beauties this package is infamous for, before deciding whether > > we'll upgrade the Debian package. > > Is library renaming bad? > > 2008-02-03 6.3.8-5 Cristy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * New Unix/Linux refactoring (should be transparent since changes are > reflected in Magick-config and ImageMagick.pc pkg-config files): > /usr/local/include => /usr/local/include/ImageMagick > libMagick => libMagickCore > libWand => libMagickWand > Magick-config (deprecated) => MagickCore-config > Wand-config (deprecated) => MagickWand-config > Add Magick++-config, MagickCore.pc, MagickWand.pc, Magick++.pc > > libMagick.so becoming libMagickCore.so, for example.
Argh! Granted, it's less bad than silent breakage of interfaces, but it's in the same league as a SONAME bump, so we'd be sure to incur the release team's wrath for causing yet another pile of testing transitions. We also ought to start splitting into separate packages for the wand and core libs. Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
