----- Forwarded message from Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:52:12 -0400
To: David Coppit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mail::Mbox::MessageParser test failures
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

I'm seeing many new test suite failures with version 1.3000 of
Mail::Mbox::MessageParser:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Mail-Mbox-MessageParser-1.3000>make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 
'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/bzip2.t t/endline.t 
t/filehandle_compressed.t t/filehandle_noncompressed.t t/filename_compressed.t 
t/filename_noncompressed.t t/grep.t t/gzip.t t/length.t t/line_number.t 
t/number.t t/offset.t t/prologue.t t/reset.t t/separators.t 
t/stdin_compressed.t t/stdin_uncompressed.t t/tzip.t
t/bzip2.......................ok                                             
t/endline.....................ok                                             
t/filehandle_compressed.......ok                                             
        4/16 skipped: tzip not available
t/filehandle_noncompressed....ok                                             
t/filename_compressed.........ok                                             
        1/4 skipped: tzip not available
t/filename_noncompressed......ok                                             
t/grep........................ok                                             
t/gzip........................ok                             
t/length......................ok 23/30#     Failed test (t/length.t at line 97)
t/length......................ok 26/30#     Failed test (t/length.t at line 97)
t/length......................ok 29/30# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 30. 
t/length......................dubious                                        
        Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
DIED. FAILED tests 24, 27
        Failed 2/30 tests, 93.33% okay
t/line_number.................NOK 24#     Failed test (t/line_number.t at line 
97)
t/line_number.................NOK 27#     Failed test (t/line_number.t at line 
97)
t/line_number.................ok 29/30# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 30. 
t/line_number.................dubious                                        
        Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
DIED. FAILED tests 24, 27
        Failed 2/30 tests, 93.33% okay
t/number......................ok 23/30#     Failed test (t/number.t at line 97)
t/number......................NOK 27#     Failed test (t/number.t at line 97)
t/number......................ok 29/30# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 30. 
t/number......................dubious                                        
        Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
DIED. FAILED tests 24, 27
        Failed 2/30 tests, 93.33% okay
t/offset......................NOK 24#     Failed test (t/offset.t at line 97)
t/offset......................ok 26/30#     Failed test (t/offset.t at line 97)
t/offset......................ok 30/30# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 30. 
t/offset......................dubious                                        
        Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
DIED. FAILED tests 24, 27
        Failed 2/30 tests, 93.33% okay
t/prologue....................ok 23/33#     Failed test (t/prologue.t at line 
85)
t/prologue....................ok 26/33#     Failed test (t/prologue.t at line 
85)
t/prologue....................ok 33/33# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 33. 
t/prologue....................dubious                                        
        Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
DIED. FAILED tests 24, 27
        Failed 2/33 tests, 93.94% okay
t/reset.......................NOK 45#     Failed test (t/reset.t at line 135)
t/reset.......................NOK 48#     Failed test (t/reset.t at line 201)
t/reset.......................NOK 51#     Failed test (t/reset.t at line 135)
t/reset.......................NOK 54#     Failed test (t/reset.t at line 201)
t/reset.......................ok 60/60# Looks like you failed 4 tests of 60. 
t/reset.......................dubious                                        
        Test returned status 4 (wstat 1024, 0x400)
DIED. FAILED tests 45, 48, 51, 54
        Failed 4/60 tests, 93.33% okay
t/separators..................ok                                             
t/stdin_compressed............ok                                             
        1/4 skipped: tzip not available
t/stdin_uncompressed..........ok                                             
t/tzip........................ok                                             
        1/1 skipped: tzip not available
Failed Test     Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/length.t         2   512    30    2   6.67%  24 27
t/line_number.t    2   512    30    2   6.67%  24 27
t/number.t         2   512    30    2   6.67%  24 27
t/offset.t         2   512    30    2   6.67%  24 27
t/prologue.t       2   512    33    2   6.06%  24 27
t/reset.t          4  1024    60    4   6.67%  45 48 51 54
7 subtests skipped.
Failed 6/18 test scripts, 66.67% okay. 14/322 subtests failed, 95.65% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255

Strange thing is that this only happens on my laptop, my server, which
should have pretty much the same versions of everything, passes all tests.
I tried moving my ~/.grepmail-cache out of the way, didn't help. Any idea
what other bit of state might be breaking it?

Looking at the first failure:

Failed, with 1 differences.
  See t/temp/length_mailbox with space_0_1.stdout.diff.
not ok 24 - Computing differences between t/results/length_mailbox with 
space.stdout and t/temp/length_mailbox with space_0_1.stdout
#     Failed test (t/length.t at line 97)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/Mail-Mbox-MessageParser-1.3000/t/temp>cat 
length_mailbox\ with\ space_0_1.stdout.diff 
diff "t/temp/length_mailbox with space_0_1.stdout" "t/results/length_mailbox 
with space.stdout"
0a1
> 1416

-- 
see shy jo



----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to