Hi all,
Sorry for not responding sooner to your emails. I'm not using b2evolution anymore, thus explaining my lack of responsiveness. Anyway, I'm ready to package a new version of b2evolution for Debian. Currently, two upstream versions are available: - 1.10.3 dated from 2007-11-01 and which is a stable version. - 2.4.0 dated from 2008-01-23 and which is a RC4 version. Which version do you think is the best ? Anyway, we won't avoid the upgrade issue from the old 0.9.2 version to the new version. This is even implying a database upgrade which can be very tricky to package.... So, what do you think is the best? Thanks for your feedback, and thank you for your interest in b2evolution in Debian :-) See you, Xavier On 29/02/2008, Arnaud Guiton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Emilio wrote: > > > In fact, I guess the package should be orphaned and removed from Debian > > if a new maintainer doesn't step up, as Xavier Luthi (the original > > maintainer) is not around (I didn't see him in mentors either). > > > While I agree that the package is in a pretty bad shape, I think > completely removing it from Debian would be a pity :-/ > > I maintained the first versions of this package but had to let Xavier > take it over because I hadn't enough time to work on it. > However, if Xavier does not respond and/or nobody wants to take care of > packaging a new version (to be in sync with upstream), I'd agree to do > it. I would not be able to do that before the end of April, though, so > that could be a problem... > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Arnaud > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFHyGdPYiSFserVDZsRAg/6AJ49RaczUj0EZhDsoJy8VboNbWCUXwCg1nwh > IkUPR55DIe5zNHj/bJbVspM= > =UcOc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
