Hi Luk,

Thanks for taking a look.

On 08/03/18 23:17 +0100, Luk Claes said ...
> Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> > On 08/01/05 17:00 +0100, Pierre Habouzit said ...
> >> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:50:56PM +0000, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >>   Rrriiight, it'd be nice if reportbug could have the proper questions,
> >> I never remember what the subject for RMs should be, and usually
> >> maintainers don't ask for removals _that_ often, so it'd be best if
> >> reportbug assumed we were stupid about that :)
> 
> > Attached patch attempts to reduce this pain.  Comments are welcome.  TV
> > indicated that he would sponsor an NMU if (among other bugs) it has this
> > bug fixed.
> 
> The current list mentions 'testing' while that is not supposed to be
> reported against ftp.debian.org, but requested on the -release list

OK.  I will then modify the code such that a bug is not reported on
ftp.debian.org for 'testing', but only a template mail is generated
indicating the user to send it to debain-release.

> instead. Additionally it would be good if there would for bugs regarding
> testing-proposed-updates, stable-proposed-updates,
> oldstable-proposed-updates, stable and oldstable be mentioned to also
> contact the -release list.

I'll deal with it like we handle WNPP ITPs (CC:ing debian-devel).

Additionally, are there any other suites that I need to include in the
list?

Cheers,

Giridhar

-- 
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to