On 17 May 2005 at 04:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > So I guess it would have to become libquantlib-0.3.9 and
| > libquantlib-0.3.9-dev as with, say libstdc++5 ?
|
| Is there a reason to use a versioned name for the -dev package? If not,
| it's probably fine to leave it as libquantlib0-dev, which may not be
| accurate, but doesn't seem to hurt anything and is the least disruptive.
|
| For most libraries, there's usually no need for versioned -dev packages.
Ack. Will do this eve.
Thanks, Dirk
--
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
