Hello, Thanks for the response.
On May 18, 2005 06:27, you wrote: > Thanks for the patch! I have a pair of questions: > > - Would it make sense to compress uuencoded patches? If so, you missed > the extension checks for *.uu.(gz|bz2) Since the primary use of uu-encoding is to turn binaries into text to avoid choking dpkg-source, then I don't think it would be very useful to compress such patches - but of course, I can't foresee all possible uses. > - Do we also need this for dpatch.mk ? To be honest, since I've never used dpatch in conjunction with CDBS, I hadn't thought of that. I have used dpatch in conjunction with "plain" debhelper, however. Since dpatch requires a header on each patch file, it doesn't seem to support uu-decoding itself, so that would have to be handled by CDBS itself. Whether you think if worthwhile to add this feature to CDBS's dpatch is up to you, I guess - I haven't thought of how it would be done. Cheers, Christopher Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
