also sprach Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.27.1743 +0100]: > Bodyparts can be designated `attachment' to indicate that they are > separate from the main body of the mail message, and that their > display should not be automatic, but contingent upon some further > action of the user. The MUA might instead present the user of a > bitmap terminal with an iconic representation of the attachments, or, > on character terminals, with a list of attachments from which the > user could select for viewing or storage.
Are we talking about MUAs or browsers? > BTW, the RFC is about MUAs, not browsers ; RFC 2616 is the relevant one, > but is not really verbose, though it kind of implies the save as dialog > should show up if content-type is application/octet-stream. OTOH, it > doesn't say anything about other cases. In this case, the content type is image/jpeg. > It also says "Content-Disposition is not part of the HTTP > standard, but since it is widely implemented" > > All that to say I'm not really convinced this is a bug. Right, and there is http://support.microsoft.com/kb/260519, and Safari, Konqueror, Epiphany, and Kazehakase all act the same. So I won't push this further. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "if I can't dance, i don't want to be part of your revolution." - emma goldman
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
