> Hi Michael, > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 09:23:56PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > Note that all this most probably does not apply to openldap 2.4 as the > > respective SASL code has seen a huge rewrite. > > In that case, could you please test with openldap 2.4 given that this is > what we have now in testing and unstable? >
No, sorry, this will be pretty much infeasible as I neither have my corrupt certificate chain nor any system easily available that I could turn into an unstable machine. BUT I took a thorough look at the respective code in openldap 2.4 and it seems that the SASL code has been split from the binding code (it was pretty much interweaved), so this should not happen anymore. At any rate, my fix will definitely not apply to openldap 2.4 for the above reason. Sorry, Michael
pgpOCbdRBWRDi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
