On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:51:27PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:42:14PM CEST: > > > > So it has an AC_DISABLE_SHARED, and I don't see why it sets it since it > > doesn't actually build any libraries. > > Why does it use AC_PROG_LIBTOOL at all, then?
I'm not sure I follow your question. Without it, it won't create a libtool at all, and won't properly build on systems that do require that you link all the deplibs? > For creating programs, it can just use --as-needed, no? In most cases you can. I've been told that it could break things if the library is using an .init section and that you might lose the dependencies on that library even if you need it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
