Hi Nick,
Thanks for getting back. We used that patch here for a while so it was
sound against v1.2.1, but we have since embarked on a rewrite (because
that seemed easier than trying to weed out all the fixed-length buffers
and possible other liabilities). The rewrite is in a different language,
and integrated with our client code rather than packaged as a library -
I don't think it would help you.
Sorry not to be able to be of more use. We would have loved to have had
an actively maintained libupnp to contribute to, but limited resources
here meant we couldn't maintain the whole thing ourselves and customer
requirements meant that we couldn't wait.
Arthur
Nick Leverton wrote:
Thanks for the patch, Arthur, and sorry you had to wait so long. As new
maintainer of libupnp I'm currently updating your patch to apply to
pupnp 1.6.5.
This being a C++ package, ideally I'd have liked to see a fix which
made use of new/delete and object destructors to release memory, rather
than malloc/free. But it looks as though that might need quite a lot
of re-working of upstream code !
So I'm going with your patch for the moment. Would you be in a position
to re-test ? If so I can send you a link to my updated sources.
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
