On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:31:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: glui > Version: 2.2-2 > Severity: serious
> Your debian/control file lists those packages:
> Package: libglui-dev
> Architecture: any
> Depends: libglui2 (= ${Source-Version}), libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev
> Package: libglui2
> Architecture: any
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
> However, the .dsc says:
> Source: glui
> Version: 2.2-2
> Binary: libglui2c102, libglui-dev
> And the control.in file uses: libglui%MAJOR%
> Where MAJOR translates to 2.
> And you have a:
> LIBGLUI := libglui$(MAJOR)c102
> Those don't all agree, and it seems the "c102" is missing from
> the name of the binary packages.
> This also has as effect that dh_installdirs creates the wrong
> directories so install fails.
This library package seems to be completely unused in sarge. Is there any
reason that it shouldn't simply be removed?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
