On 08/04/08 10:28 +0200, Joerg Jaspert said ... > On 11349 March 1977, Y. Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
Err, this date is a bit before I was born actually :) > > Now that #459333 has been fixed (supports RM request acronyms, partial > > Does it do it with the correct titles? Nice. Yes, it does. > Now, looking in the patch attached to that bug, please remove > [cruft-report] from the possible reasons, thats nothing a user will ever > report. [1] Unfortunately the updated package is already in the archive. Can you please file a bug? I will post a patch that can be included in the next upload. > I will look at mentioning that in our html page soon. Thank you. > [1] Its explained on our page as it is a commonly used reason in the > removal logs, but those are semi-automagically and only done by an > ftpmaster/assistant using a special tool. OK, when I looked at removals.html, I felt that the cruft finder script could be a tool that can probably be run by folks that have acess to a local mirror or something. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
