tags 310216 + pending thanks Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yeah, OK, good, I'll just remove the check in -11 or -1 and wait until >> another udev user reports a bug telling me everything is broken. > > No one will report it because the code doesn't misbehave. I just > happened to notice the problem will looking at the code for other > reasons. udev check removed from our svn tree, so it's in for the next revision. Glad to see that makedev now makes our life easier :) Wish it could have happened earlier... Thanks, JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
