-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Wodrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Roger Leigh schrieb:
>
>>>> This is my new version (comments removed):
>>>> auth       sufficient pam_rootok.so
>>>> @include common-auth
>>>> @include common-account
>>>> @include common-session
>>>> session optional        pam_limits.so
>> That looks fine.
>
> That the version after I can fix the su-Problem
> myself. Befor the fix the last line was:
>
> session required        pam_limits.so

It wasn't obvious earlier that the problem was pam_limits.so.  That
may well be a problem: on my system, I've always made that required,
and it always worked.

Just a thought: are there any syntax errors in
/etc/security/limits.conf?


- -- 
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux        http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFCkLd7VcFcaSW/uEgRAss2AJ9VGRb0ytIj2lqsc314XC76Mp8RvACdFBYO
ebvW1IyLd0dnywf/hY59Wa8=
=eLxX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to