On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 10:48 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Quoting Justin B Rye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > > > How about: > > > > > > Should kexec-tools handle reboots? If you accept this option, > > > invocations of "shutdown -r" will trigger a restart into a kernel > > > loaded by kexec instead of going through the full system bootloader > > > process. > > > > > > Which would of course turn to: > > > > _Description: Should kexec-tools handle reboots? > > If you accept this option, invocations of 'shutdown -r' will trigger > > a restart into a kernel loaded by kexec instead of going through the > > full system bootloader process. > > > Khalid, what's the status of this suggestion/rewrite of the debconf > template ? > > Once you adopt the new template, you should indeed add to your package > tree the pending debconf l10n translations (#469960, #470499, > #470921), then run "debconf-updatepo" and then use the > "podebconf-report-po" utility to call for translation updates, leaving > about 10 days to translators to cope with updates. > > Actually, I even suggest using > "podebconf-report-po --call --languageteam" so that a call for new > translations is sent to debian-i18n and the language teams are > notified of the needed changes (not only translators) > > Could you please keep me posted about this? Without news, I'll start > an "l10n NMU" process.. > >
Hi Christian, I am getting back to this again now. I just sent another proposal out. Hopefully we are starting to converge on the right wording for the description. I appreciate the guidance you have provided on this since this is the first time I am dealing with debconf setup on a package. -- =================== Khalid Aziz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
