On 17/04/08 at 11:32 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Hi, Lucas, thanks as always for your QA work. > > The build log you posted is a little odd. Compare it to the buildd > log[0], which was successful, and you see the failing call to ld > differs: > > your line: ld -o libcgi-java.so cgi-java.o > buildd line: ld -fpic -shared -lc -o libcgi-java.so cgi-java.o > > The relevant bits of the Makefile are: > > ifeq ($(LDVER),GNU) > LDFLAGS?=-fpic -shared -lc > else > LDFLAGS?=-lc > endif > > lib%.so: %.o > $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $< > > Are you setting LDFLAGS in your build? If so, what is the correct way to > solve this? (I'm upstream as well) > > - remove the ? in the makefile > - set LDFLAGS in debian/rules > - move -lc or all of the flags to a different variable name. > - ignore it and close the bug because it's the fault of whoever set > LDFLAGS.
dpkg-buildpackage now sets LDFLAGS to an empty value by default. See d-d-a. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
