On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:56:12PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 12:05 +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > > Currenlt nscld is set to start by default at level 20, which is the same > > level as exim. exim coming first becuase of alphabet. This mean for a > > period of time no ldap users are valid with regards to exim. I have seen > > bounced emails because of this. > > > > I was going to suggest 19 but it seems like slapd starts there and I > > would like to give slapd a chance to start before nscld starts because > > by backup (alternative URI's) are on a different site > > Starting nslcd before slapd can be done but is generally not a good idea > because it will slow down the boot process due to problems connecting to > the LDAP server. If nslcd knows that the LDAP server is down this could > also cause problems for subsequent lookups in a certain time period > until nslcd is aware that the LDAP server is available again. > > This means that sequence 19 may cause problems and 20 currently causes > problems for exim.
yep, I have moved slapd done to 18, 19 for nslcd. > > I am in the process of rethinking/rewriting the reconnect logic in > nss-ldapd which could make it easier to start earlier. If i might suggest the ability to add a weight to each uri thus if would be possible to priorities slapd servers > > -- > -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- -- Dave Mack: "Your stupidity, Allen, is simply not up to par." Allen Gwinn: "Yours is."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
