On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:06:02PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:26:39AM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote: > > Gerrit Pape wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Eddy Petri??or wrote: > >>> There are very frequent scenarios when is desirable to limit the > >>> status command just to a directory or a set of files in the repo. > >>> > >>> I would have expected that "git status ." to show me only the status > >>> for the files under the current directory under any circumstances, > >>> not the whole repo with filenames relative to the current directory. > >>> What is the purpose of such behaviour? > >> > >> Hi Eddy, IIRC there has been some discussion about this in the git > >> mailing list recently, within the last months. I currently am not sure > >> about the outcome. > > > > I tried seaching for this, but I couldn't find it. Any help is > > appreciated (even a forwarding of the BR). > > Does this help?: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/72527
Hi Eddy, there's been another thread about the 'git status' behavior, see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/79366 Does that clear it up?, I'd like to close this report. Thanks, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
