On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:22:31AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > Sami: latencytop is a debug tool, so I think we are allowed put more > requirement to the caller (and to put less code on the debugged > program (kernel)). So I don't think is so important to handle better > multiple instances of latencytop.
That's reasonable. Perhaps I should have filed this originally as
severity wishlist. I did it mostly just to document the issue, so
perhaps wishlist would really have been more appropriate.
Thanks,
Sami
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
