On Thursday 24 Apr 2008 2:20:59 pm Jean-Francois Dockes wrote:
> I'm the Recoll developper. For some reason, I never got the messages
> about this problem.
Oh :(
> It is clearly a consequence of problem 471976 (excessive memory usage
> during indexing).
>
> Recoll can't exit without flushing the index (this would produce a
> corrupted database). So the alternative is to either rezero the index
> and exit immediately, or flush the data and hope it won't take too long.
>
> The second approach is more reasonable in most cases.
>
> It might be possible to differentiate INT, TERM and QUIT to optionally
> select the first one, but I doubt many people would bother.
>
> This problem is just a secondary effect, which will go away if a fix can
> be found for Bug#471976.
So, can we merge both bugs? Or mark that #471976 is blocker of #471978 bug?
Let me know. I will do the appropriate to BTS.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
Blogs: {ftbfs,kartikm}.wordpress.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
