> this was intentional, as ltsp doesn't really have testing network boot
> support for most architectures, and many architectures don't really seem
> to likely to be useful as thin-clients.

People do _sell_ arm/mips based thin clients, so "amd64 i386 powerpc"
seems overly restrictive.

-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to