Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:21:11AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> An alternative fix that doesn't require modifications to gnutls is to >> have exim and any other application set value themselves: >> >> gnutls_handshake_set_max_packet_length (session, 64*1024); >> >> FYI, the total packet size to do a TLS handshake with your server is >> 25kb, which is the largest I've seen so far. >> >> I'll backport the change from 16kb to 48kb to the v2.2 branch. We will >> do a new stable release soon. > > If the backport will be in Unstable soon, I'd rather refrain from > patching exim. What do you think?
I'm preparing a 2.2.3 now, you can get a release candidate from: http://josefsson.org/tmp/gnutls-2.2.3.tar.bz2 It contains that fix, and a few others. /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
