On May 11, Davide Prina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't it a bug in module-init-tools, then? If update-modules does No.
> > nothing, it should be removed! IMHO, setserial does the right thing: This would instantly break an unknown number of packages (but feel free to grep the whole archive for update-modules invocations and I will reconsider this). > > before executing update-modules, it tests whether it is available, > > so that it can work with old versions of module-init-tools (where > > update-modules is useful) *and* with future ones where update-modules > > should be removed. There are no versions of module-init-tools where update-modules is useful, it only had an use in modutils which is old enough that modern packages do not need to care. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
