On Wed, 14 May 2008, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
That's not a patch.
True. Sorry for beeing to short (I wrongly assumed that this knowledge is widely spread).
*Which* file needs to be altered *how*?
debian/control The Homepage field can be added anywhere in the source section. Perhaps you prefer a different position according your personal taste, but the attachment contains a valid patch.
We had several competing proposals for encoding this in the past. Which won?
Developers reference section 6.2.4. BTW, you might find Section 6.2.5 interesting as well in case the packaging is maintained in a version control system. In the end is a complete example also for Homepage.
Kind regards and thanks for maintaining RMy pleasure.
:) Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
--- debian/control.orig 2008-05-14 08:23:36.000000000 +0200 +++ debian/control 2008-05-14 08:24:30.000000000 +0200 @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Uploaders: Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.7.3 Build-Depends: gcc (>= 4:4.1.0), g++ (>= 4:4.1.0), gfortran (>= 4:4.1.0), libblas-dev, liblapack-dev (>= 3.1.1), tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, bison, groff-base, libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev, debhelper (>= 5.0.0), texi2html, texinfo (>= 4.1-2), libbz2-dev, libpcre3-dev, xpdf-reader, zlib1g-dev, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libx11-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev, libtiff4-dev, xvfb, xbase-clients, xfonts-base, texlive-base, texlive-latex-base, texlive-generic-recommended, texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-extra-utils, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-latex-extra, texinfo, texi2html +Homepage: http://www.r-project.org/ Package: r-base Architecture: all
