Hey, On Thursday 15 May 2008 14:48:46 you wrote: > severity 481344 wishlist Sorry, I disagree with that. This change of cowdancer broke the support for chroot other than unstable and testing. This is not the idea of such a tool in my eyes.. I e.g. use it for creating backports for a customer and therefore a working etch chroot is essential for this work. Since this change of cowdancer has a great impact of usability of many chroots this has to be a RC Bug and nothing else. Since I doesn't want to play BTS pingpong here, please raise the severity at least to serious.
> retitle 481344 provide cowdancer etch backport Mh.. .this has to be changed in the official archive.. not via backports...of course feel free to backport this to backports.org but please integrate something that made etch chroot's working again: maybe a fallback if the ilist stuff is not available as it was working in previous versions. Greetings Winnie -- .''`. Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : GNU/Linux Debian Developer `. `'` http://www.der-winnie.de http://people.skolelinux.org/~winnie `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems Spamtrap: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
