On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:42:22PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> Strange, I cannot reproduce this with any of the atached files, if I use
> ispell-word n{o+e}ud is properly shown as an alternative ({o+e} stands
> for "o dans l'e") and replaced, and the replacement is recognised as a
> single word. If I use flyspell 'n?ud' is proposed, but word is correctly
> replaced and also recognised as a single word.
> 
> Tried with emacs21, emacs22 and xemacs.
> 
> I however get the behavior you describe with emacs-snapshot, which it is not
> part of Debian and on purpose, does not use anything from
> dictionaries-common.
> 
> Are you sure you are not using emacs-snapshot?

Opps, forgot to attach files,

-- 
Agustin
-*- coding: iso-8859-15 -*-

neud

c½ur
C¼UR

;; Local Variables:
;; ispell-local-dictionary: "francais"
;; End:
-*- coding: utf-8 -*-

neud

cœur
CŒUR

;; Local Variables:
;; ispell-local-dictionary: "francais"
;; End:

Reply via email to