> > I am thinking whether it's the right time to split db.root to separate > > package, so it can be kept in sync with changes. > > However, your point is interesting and valid. However, I expect every > DNS server has its own murky format that would cause some difficulties > (and some even store their configs in databases). Even though there is > an RFC that defines the configuration file format, that doesn't mean > name resolvers follow it. Creating such a root hits package could be a > challenge and would likely require cooperation from the various package > developers at which point its questionable if a different package is > a worthwhile effort as each package maintainer could just build this > update into their own package, suited for their own package's individual > peculiarities.
bind uses db.root, unbound uses db.root and I just checked pdns-recursor can use hint file as well. I am not aware of more not-broken implementations of recursive DNS servers. Ondrej. -- Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** http://blog.rfc1925.org/ Kulturní občasník *** http://www.obcasnik.cz/ Nehoupat, prosím *** http://nehoupat.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
