On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:47:34PM +0200, jaromil wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > re, > > i'll be grateful if anyone finds the time for answering to my > curiosity (almost becoming anxiety about the handling of this package) > > on which base can we state that the javascript parser "spidermonkey" > version is unrelated to the "xulrunner" package? > > what are precisely the additions to spidermonkey as "XUL"?
The code is from the same source tree, only built with slightly different options. > where can i read for details about packaging policy for xulrunner? > > let me also state that it is incorrect to call spidermonkey as an > unactive progress, new releases have been regularly published on > mozilla foundation's ftp for years now. There are exactly 2 published versions right now, one from 22-Dec-2006 and one from 19-Oct-2007. I don't call that reliable, especially when you take a look at the number of changes that occurred in the js code during the last two years for security fixes. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
