On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:18:32 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: [RFCs] > This is muddy waters to me :) I udnerstand EHLO <fqdn> is recommended, > but the old syntax and semantics must also be supported.
Agreed, but in practice it seems a bit fragile :) > > > Postfix configured to reject non-FQDN HELOs (which is a helpful > > > anti-spam measure that stops quite a bit of bogus mail) > > > therefore rejects the mail. > If my reading of the above is right, this is not conformant to the > standard. Right, but on the other hand using Sys::Hostname::Long and supplying a FQDN seems cleaner in any case and doesn't hurt. My suggestion is to make the suggested changes to libmail-sendmail-perl (in fact I've just prepared a patch which kept me from reading your mail in time :)). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Jimi Hendrix: Wild Thing
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
