tags 483242 + pending patch On 27/05/08 at 23:21 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Package: developers-reference > Version: 3.3.9 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > I think that Section A.2.2 can be removed since linda has been removed > from sid/lenny.
Hi, I commited the following to svn: Index: best-pkging-practices.dbk =================================================================== --- best-pkging-practices.dbk (revision 5178) +++ best-pkging-practices.dbk (working copy) @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ per each architecture. While this adds some extra overhead into the <filename>Packages</filename> files, it saves a lot of disk space on Debian mirrors. Separating out architecture-independent data also reduces processing -time of <command>lintian</command> or <command>linda</command> (see <xref +time of <command>lintian</command> (see <xref linkend="tools-lint"/> ) when run over the entire Debian archive. </para> </section> Index: tools.dbk =================================================================== --- tools.dbk (revision 5178) +++ tools.dbk (working copy) @@ -112,15 +112,6 @@ </para> </section> -<section id="linda"> -<title><systemitem role="package">linda</systemitem></title> -<para> -<systemitem role="package">linda</systemitem> is another package linter. It is -similar to <systemitem role="package">lintian</systemitem> but has a different -set of checks. Its written in Python rather than Perl. -</para> -</section> - <section id="debdiff"> <title><systemitem role="package">debdiff</systemitem></title> <para> -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
