On 03/06/08 at 11:09 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > tags 459343 + patch > thanks > > Heya, > > Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Please make it more clear that uploads to stable / oldstable do need a > > mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > * It would also be good to not use stable-proposed-updates if uploading > > is mentioned as uploading to stable-proposed-updates doesn't work. > > > > * Mentioning oldstable / oldstable-proposed-updates might also make sense... > > > > * Uploading security updates is mentioned as a deprecated practice, I > > think it would be better to link to the section about security uploads > > and mention that security issues not considered for a DSA can still be > > considered for proposed-updates... > > The following patch addresses all of these suggestions. The first item > was done by moving the contact information from the end of the section > to the first paragraph, which seems more sane, as it's the most > important bit. Please review:
Sounds good. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
