On Fri, 06 Jun 2008, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:25:24AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > the problem which you are describing is a general one that applies > > to all things which were dependencies which have been downgraded > > to recommends.
> The problem with bash-completion is that it has *never* been a > dependency of bash; The presence of a portion of the functionality within the package creates a de facto dependency; thus, it's a general issue. [..] > Who is "we"? I mean we as in Debian, not we as in the tech ctte. In any event, I believe I have made my position on this issue abundantly clear, as have you. It remains to the tech ctte to jump in, adopt resolutions and/or decide one way or the other. Don Armstrong -- If you find it impossible to believe that the universe didn't have a creator, why don't you find it impossible that your creator didn't have one either? -- Anonymous Coward http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=167556&cid=13970629 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
