On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:03:13PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 02:51:07PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Note, I wonder if there aren't possible problems with other macros, > > such as ENABLE_SWAPFS and ENABLE_COMPRESSION. > > > > No, those affect even more obscure, for-internal-use definitions. In > 1.41, ENABLE_SWAPFS will be disappearing entirely, and in the future > the compression support may be ripped out as well.
Well, I, for one, wouldn't mind being "authorized" to use inlines for bitopts, such as byte-swapping and bitmap tests. I know I could implement them myself, but I kind of don't like code duplication, especially when I'm already using ext2fs headers and almost everything I would like is already there... BTW, I wouldn't mind having the C alternative for ext2fs_test_bit and friends as "public" inlines, too ; basically, everything most of what lies in bitopts.c. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
