Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > I'm quite surprise to see this bug closed, which is basicly a documentation > fix, > after four years of no activity. > > Notice that my request was (1) to change upstream's FAQ
Which was clearly rejected. > and (2) to complement > the README.Debian file. If upstream does not want to change the FAQ you could > still provide more information in README.Debian. Why? Because upstream rejected to add it to the FAQ? This is a misuse of README.Debian. We have a package description already containing relevant information. Further idea.c is not part of the gnupg source [1] and therefor also not part of the Debian package. This is not a suprise to the user, that we have to document in README.Debian. Further upstream provides enough information. > The text I provided for README.Debian could be improved, but I'm surprised > that > instead of fixing it it is diregarded. I don't see a compelling reason to add this information. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
