> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I also think that the "3.0 (git)" format would benefit from some further
> > work... for instance I'd like the git version to be added in a header in
> > the .dsc
> What git version? Git repositories do not have a version number.
Not quite true. Git repository format is currently set to 0.
$ head .git/config
[core]
repositoryformatversion = 0
$ builtin-init-db.c:repository_format_version != GIT_REPO_VERSION
$ setup.c: inspect check_repository_format* functions.
> > so that if Git's internal format changes in some incompatible way
> > it's possible to identify which source package use the old format.
> If git's "internal" (aka "external") format changes in some incompatible
> way, then every published git repo on the internet will be broken.
might be quite unlikely, but possible, so I find Raphael suggestion of adding
git repo format version to *.dsc absolutely reasonable and wise.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
