2008/6/2 Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:44:03PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote: >> I am really confused by that "ever". Are you suggesting that it >> shouldn't have been there in the first place?! > > No, it should be there because that is the intended behavior, but I > don't particularly like it. > >> 2) Because sensible-browser is the only "browser" that is able to >> respect the options of the admin and the users, no matter: >> a) which browsers are installed on a system >> b) how many users are present on a system >> c) if X is used or not: > > Perhaps you would like to package browse and give it a high priority: > http://www.dwheeler.com/browse/
That is not nearly as good as using sensible-browser >> "When several packages all provide different versions of the same >> program or file it is useful to have the system select a default, but >> to allow the system administrator to change it and have their >> decisions respected." > > So what is your suggestion? Raise the sensible-browser priority > to what? Highest prio available, so that is always used, sensible-browser itself making sure it will choose the right browser, no matter the situation (number of users, number of browsers installed, is X running). -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
