El Thursday 19 June 2008 04:38:25 Daniel Burrows escribió: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:30:23PM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > El Wednesday 18 June 2008 04:48:08 Daniel Burrows escribió: > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:24:08AM +0200, Noel David Torres Taño > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > > > I still happens: > > > > > > Which recommendation isn't being fulfilled? (i.e., I need the > > > package you installed or upgraded, the version or versions involved, > > > and the recommendation that needs to be followed) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > > It was clearly stated in the remaining text of my e-mail: > > > > _action_: full-upgrade > > _actualized packages_: adduser bash cpp-4.2 debian-reference-common > > debian-reference-es gcc-4.2 gcc-4.2-base gcc-doc-base gfortran-4.2 gzip > > iso-codes klogd libdbus-glib-1-2 libfam0 libgfortran2 libhyphen0 > > libnspr4-0d liborbit2 libruby1.8 libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules libsnmp-base > > libsnmp15 libspeex1 libspeexdsp1 libvte-common libvte9 libx86-1 > > libxcb-shape0 libxcb-shm0 libxcb-xv0 libxcb1 python-glade2 python-gtk2 > > rdesktop ruby1.8 sysklogd uswsusp xdg-utils xserver-xorg-video-fbdev > > xserver-xorg-video-glint xserver-xorg-video-i128 xserver-xorg-video-i740 > > _installed dependency_: debian-reference-en > > _noninstalled recommendation_: fam > > > > You just had to read. Even being in spanish, it was easy enough to > > recognize the text I sent as the output of an 'aptitude -r full-upgrade' > > command. > > That's not the information I need; sorry if I wasn't clearer earlier. > I wasn't sure if you meant fam, since that category just lists > uninstalled recommendations related to packages being upgraded, not > new recommendations that should be installed; I figured you might have a > different package in mind. > > I need the *specific* package that should be triggering the fam > installation (again assuming you mean fam). i.e., which package did you > upgrade that didn't recommend fam in the past and now does, and what are > its versions? (or what new package was installed that requires fam -- > but I assumed that debian-reference-en didn't recommend fam, and it looks > like I was right) Yes, I *could* trawl the repository and > snapshots.debian.org for the 43 packages you list above and see which > one got a new dependency on fam recently, but I thought that since you > reported the bug it would be more efficient to ask you. :-) > > It might also be helpful if I could have access to the output of > aptitude-create-state-bundle for debugging purposes. > > Thanks, > Daniel
Obviously the pakage that triggers the nonfulfilled recommendation is libfam0, which was upgraded from 2.7.0-13.2 to 2.7.0-13.3 Noel er Envite P.S. What did you say about "didn't recommend fam in the past and now does"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
