Jim Meyering wrote:

> Actually, now I'm convinced that is _not_ a bug, but rather the intended
> behavior, since "cp --no-preserve=mode ..." is equivalent to "cp ...",
> and cp's default behavior is to use the src permission bits (masked via
> umask) as the destination permission bits.

OK, and then what use case for cp --no-preserve=mode ?


-- 
sergio



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to