Am Dienstag, den 01.07.2008, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Sandro Tosi: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 09:42, Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Montag, den 30.06.2008, 15:36 +0000 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking > > System: > >> E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage > >> > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > >> > Von: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > Betreff: Your version of <package> (<version>) is newer than that in > >> > Debian - fixed > >> > Datum: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:33:50 +0200 > >> > > >> > Version: 3.39-0.1 > >> > > >> > As reported in changelog for that version: > >> > > >> > * Indicate that in mode > standard incoming and NEW are also checked > >> > with > >> > --check-available (Closes: #450523, #447380) > >> > > >> > So, this bug is fixed, as long as you use "mode > standard"; infact: > > > > Eh, no. For one, I used the standard mode, as indicated by reportbug in > > the bug report. > > Here is a strict greater-than
Misunderstanding on my part. > > > > [1] I use Romain's emacs-snapshots packages from his homepage and the > > full changelog starting 2004 is included. > > Mh, well, I don't know how packaging system react to the same package > version in repo installed from a non-ufficial one. At the time I reported the bug, emacs-snapshot was an official package. I only mentioned the above to show that the changelogs of the now unofficial emacs-snapshot package also cover the old case. > Anyhow, are you still able to reporduce this bug? No, which is part of the problem :) and the reason I didn't reopen the bug. Anyway, if it pops again, I'll come back. Thanks for caring. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]