On 05-Jul-2008, Riccardo Stagni wrote: > Anyway, that field in debian/control is going to be removed as I > made a wrong assumption about it: the repository I linked is the > upstream one, but that field is meant to contain the location of the > repository used to maintain the package. > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-vcs
That's right. > (I don't plan to release an updated version of qingy just to close > this bug and the other you reported as I prefer to wait that > upstream releases a fix for #447512) Sure. When you fix the bug in your own VCS, you can mark the bug report with the 'pending' tag so the reporter knows it's due to be closed in the next release. -- \ “An eye for an eye would make the whole world blind.” —Mahatma | `\ Gandhi | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
